Thanks for helping me out! If I may, why exactly is so much media anti-trump?
As for why the media is disproportionately disfavorable of Trump, compared to the votes cast... any answer to that is going to be very controversial depending on your political beleifs.
I think the simple and relatively unbiased and uncontroversial (inasmuch as that's possible) version is, Trump has very low support among those living in cities, and higher support among rural areas (though still low, as far as many voters were concerned this was a race to the bottom). And journalists live in cities.
Anything else that can be said on the matter will get heated pretty quickly. There's a genuine problem in that we don't know for sure why people elected him; neither polls nor common public discourse would have suggested it was likely before the fact. And most of us (in the cities, I guess?) were bloody confused, even before then, as to how, well... not to put too fine a point on it, how a grotesquely offensive raving idiot madman was doing so well in the polls. Actually, a lot of us still are, though we've come up with some very good post-facto rationalizations as to why and how our opinions differed so much without us noticing.
(As for the media being biased against Trump, a lot of us don't think they are. We think he's genuinely horrifying enough to merit the tone of coverage he usually gets. It just inevitably sounds melodramatic when you cover the guy in a normal fashion, because he's a very melodramatic guy who does melodramatic things, and unfortunately often right in the middle of delicate situations. But I'm not going to get into that here. I'm just trying to outline, somewhat shakily and at a very high level, the sort of national discourse dysfunction we're having right now.)
- Silvermoment likes this