The point was is how it seemed to apply in this instance in such extreme, and not at all in other examples. Belruel has been the only of repliers to the thread that has broached the main subject of the thread.
Wait, that's definitely not what the title of this thread want.
You should change the title then if what you want is not really the answer of "why would they get punished for heroing?"
Maybe to "Why is that this law was never been a problem before the Stain's arc?"
One reason might be because author needed it. A story driven inconsistency put in to get the story to move in the direction the author needed.
While that may be true, i don't really felt any inconsistency there.
Stain's arc is different from other previous arc so far in the first place, because:
1. The true trigger is Iida's reckless vengeance, not the villain attacking them first.
2. There are witnesses (Iida's WorkField Mentor and that Native Hero the victim of Stain) who may not totally kept the students flaw a secret to police cuz they aren't staff at Uei.
3. Stain's actually successfully defeated and apprehended.
With this different details it's not strange that the matter of law finally explored.
Plus, the fact that the police actually offer to let them slide from punishment for the cost of fame, is a definite proof that the police themself doesn't like this law especially when they know the unlicensed heroes are just doing justice.
Edited by Haremmony, 18 April 2016 - 04:22 PM.