What I meant is that this may not be the standard sci-fi type teleportation which destroys the body and reconstructs it elsewhere, but instead shoves the whole body to a different location through a higher dimensional wormhole.
That does seem like a possibility, but that seems unlikely to be case. Just from visual effects, it doesn't seem like it's that kind of teleportation. I don't mean that it doesn't follow some kind of vague wormhole physics, but that it's the type of wormhole where the body is sent through without affecting the harness directly, as if the harness isn't directly moved by the teleportation spell and simply moves along the body. It appears most likely that the harness either "disintegrates and forms together" or "the particles reposition in space" or "the particles are accelerated" (most importantly: all by themselves without considering the movement of the body itself. The effect of teleportation affected each point in space including the harness)
I would never be complaining if that's how it appeared to be in the manga.
For instance this scene: http://vatoto.com/read/_/110078/gokukoku-no-brynhildr_ch18_by_trinity-bakuma/16
Kotori switched positions from her hand being tied to a pole with the magic user who had both her hands tying Neko to the ground. The end result makes it so that Kotori has both her hands tying Neko to the ground. This is a clear example of particle rearrangement, and I don't mean just visually. If it was simply changing positions through going through a wormhole, Kotori would've had her hands and arms in a position as if it was tied to a pole on top of Neko.
As for the magic negation, the witch hunter's ability (which works by the same principle) filters which "types" of powers are permitted to work. So the harness could technically ignore teleportation powers by default, though I'm not sure why it would.
Yes, that's why it's arbitrary. Being arbitrary is a factor of what considers certain elements to be plot holes.
I mentioned ch74 because it tells us where a witch's memories are actually stored. One could say the time manipulation effect in Saori's case was actually restricted to the inside of her own harness. What she did is the equivalent of sending her memories back a minute into the past - which I presume is what her power did.
hmm interesting point. The memories are in the drasil/harness so if what I said was right, then the time reversal magic didn't affect the harness which means that it didn't affect Saori's memories. But then if that's the case, how come it affects other magic user's memories?
Also I think what you said is factually wrong. In my first post, I mentioned how the magic reversal also failed to affect the external part of the harness. That's why the harness hung up and one of the buttons were pushed once the magic ran out. So it's not just the internal part of the harness that the magic failed to affect.
2. I usually consider stuff that doesn't make sense to be plot holes. You're distinguishing between plot holes and unrealistic settings, but when you consider the various implications of unrealistic setting elements you run into contradicitons fast. I haven't read One Piece, but if the speed of light is slower, this has implications. While you'd probably need a physicist to give you a full list, you don't need to be one to know that an attack delivered to you at the speed of light can't be seen before it hits you. So if someone in the story does at some point, that constitutes a plot hole immediately. More interestingly, with a lower speed of light you should be able to see into the past by using binoculars at a high vantage point (also, you'd have shorter nights). These are the sorts of implications story writers usually don't consider (as they themselves are not physicists), and in an unrealistic setting there's usually so many contradictions stemming from things like that that it would be futile to even try listing them all. Most people don't have the background to notice most of them, though (e.g. a physicist still won't notice what a psychologist would consider an obvious plot hole), and even when they do it's something one learns to overlook for the sake of a story.
Yes I agree with that. Plot holes tend to appear a lot more frequently the more fictional elements get tied into the storyline. The reason why I made that distinction was to say that there's a difference between a supposed impossible/unrealistic event and an event that contradicts the logic of the setting in place. If the primary definition of plot holes involved the first one, then everything concerning spirits/magic should be considered a plot hole with enough scrutiny.
If teleportation did not "affect" the harness, then magic users that were teleported would have a huge hole in their neck and probably lose their human body.
That's really my point you know.
Besides, its magic, and its not like they have to have an explanation for everything.
That's a pathetic excuse for creating a fictional world. The whole point is to provide a background to show how the world functions, even if they are loose rules. And the author technically did, it's just that there's some inconsistencies that I pointed out.
Her teleport also destroys energy, since Murakami's kinetic energy from falling was destroyed. That already goes against the first law of thermodynamics. Simply put, its magic.
That may or may not be true. All that has to be the case is that the kinetic energy has to go somewhere, it didn't technically show that it was destroyed.
Also, its more likely that they meant that harnesses can not be harmed, destroyed, or tampered with by the means of magic. So a telekinetic user couldn't push the button and eject someone, but they could possibly toss a stone at the button and eject them.
What the heck, the second example wasn't even magic. Also the translation clearly says "not affected" rather then "damaged" and similar translations appear for the anime. I also discussed with someone who read the Japanese raws and it appears to be the case.
But again, its magic, it doesn't always have the most concrete rules.
No it doesn't, but if there's a rule that says "harnessed can't be affected by magic" I would assume that that rule shouldn't be broken unless for some good reason.
Edited by Saphsin, 08 June 2014 - 10:43 PM.