Played it on PC, but the PC couldnt handle its amazing graph.
i need to get a new comp, i must be able to play 64 player matches.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bP8_Dmfbe0&feature=feedu
Edited by Artimis, 04 October 2011 - 09:42 PM.
Edited by Artimis, 04 October 2011 - 09:42 PM.
I'm feeling depressed since I havent moved my PC to city I'm studying now,so when get my PC here soon I'll make him pay up for time he has wasted.And one of things he will be suffering from will be BF3,AC:Revelations,Batman:Arkham City,Rage,NFS:Run
Lol, wtf?
The copy of the game will be around AUS $80+ over here, per usual. Compared to the european/US prices, that's such a ripoff :'[
It looks pretty badass and I'm definitely going to play the public beta when it's out in a few days (:
iMangaScans | ViScans |-| deviantART | MyAnimeList |-| Ame Agari Subs
''Do to others what you would wish to be done to you.''
My favourite song ^^
Is it good? The Last Battlefield game I played is Battlefield 2 ==*
I didn't follow the next installments...
Since I'm more of a CoD player... Don't hate me for this >.,<
I was a Battlefield 2 player and I'm quite a 'decent' one (NOT bad company 2)Hmm. CoD is a fast paced arcade shooter, Battlefield is a war simulator.
If you play for the multiplayer, switch to battlefield now!
Edited by ashax, 29 December 2011 - 10:36 AM.
Well the more popular the series is, the better the multiplayer right? And don't worry, most BF3 players are 18yo+ you won't see much trolling and wanking like in MW2 hahahaI was a Battlefield 2 player and I'm quite a 'decent' one (not bad company 2)
But I'm already used to Call of Duty because i play it more often (I followed the series since Call of Duty 1)
because it is more 'Fun'
but now... My love for both series have dropped so much since both of them gain public popularity
now my hope for shooters is on other series
(i.e. FarCry <3> , Bioshock <Infinite>, S.T.A.L.K.E.R. <2> , Borderlands <2> , etc.)
My thoughts is the opposite of yours, even though they are more popular now, it feels as if there's something missing from them...Well the more popular the series is, the better the multiplayer right? And don't worry, most BF3 players are 18yo+ you won't see much trolling and wanking like in MW2 hahaha
Edited by ashax, 29 December 2011 - 11:02 AM.
My thoughts is the opposite of yours, even though they are more popular now, it feels as if there's something missing from them...
but in my mind the best CoD multiplayer was Cod4:MW1 where all the weapons are balanced and the killstreaks are not OP and game ruining...
and the best Battlefield multiplayer was Battlefield 2 IMO (Imagine in BF3 you prone in a high building using a sniper scoping for enemy, moments later a guy in the next town kills you with an AK)
P.S. someone called me a noob once in an SnD match on MW2, then I wiped out the whole enemy team after around 25 seconds after the next round start...
Then he called me a 'hacker'...
Fortunately I was a regular in that server and I'm registered on the B3 (Big Brother Bot), and I'm one of the 'Best' players in that server...
Then the admin temp-banned the guy after everyone sides with me... I don't even need to do anything
A ZeroPunctuation review on both MW3 and Battlefield 3:Well the killstreaks would be balanced if they would just remove emergency airdrop and care package... Got up to 5th prestige with 14days in-game and I could say that it's all pretty balanced, I play on PSN though...
And they fixed that in BF3 (don't know about bad company 2).. The frostbite 2 game engine is awesome at long range firefights, I reckon no weapon will hit you 300meters away if it's not scoped. No weapon will hit you 700meters away if it's not bolt action. Not to mention that the sight elevation would make it impossible for any gun if it's not a recon rifle XDD I could only wish that I have a good enough desktop to play it in the PC
His review on BF3 was exclusively about single player....A ZeroPunctuation review on both MW3 and Battlefield 3:
Spoiler