2 replies to this topic

[Bookwurm]

This should be changed to vol.12 ch.215

http://vatoto.com/reader#fdd14cc07ab89e94

 

And this should be changed to vol.12 ch.216

http://vatoto.com/reader#478f8623c6fe4283

 

Thanks

Edited by Bookwurm, 13 June 2017 - 01:51 PM.

[αρняσɖιтє]

Just my personal opinion, it's not necessary to have volume numbers. I mean, maybe if the chapters aren't in order but usually if the group doesn't want to use volume numbers, it's up to them, really.

[OMGWTFBBQPONIES]

Best Answer

as NibbPower said, if the scanlator/uploader doesn't want the volume number, it's up to them. technically magazine scans shouldn't get one at all costs in the first place because it can lead to number guessing and different groups releasing same chapters as being from different volumes
 

maybe if the chapters aren't in order

not necessary; that is - volume can be taken into consideration in Sorting ID but it can be added there manually, leaving the volume field itself blank. the uploader here did just that, it seems (or someone edited it in later).