Master_Aricitic said they wanted to drop this topic, which is fine by me, I dropped it three days ago out of courtesy to the OP. FrostAyy, why don't you do the same and just walk away.
I stopped my argument with Aereus because I decided it was going nowhere. People don't read what I post, they read what they want and react. I spent a minimum of one hour posting them - one was three hours - so that I wasn't simply being reactionary, and was actually putting thought into what I posted, and, as with the next person, people simply skimmed what I said, took from it what they wanted, and replied back...
Master Aricitic thinks he's the shit with some twisted logic.
He has a problem with this:
Main scanlator takes Author's work, translates it, distributes it. Sub-scanlator releases a lower quality version of main scanlator's work, who asks that distributor removes it. Distributor removes work from site.
Master Aricitic thinks that main scanlator has no right in asking distributor to remove the work since it isn't owned by main scanlator. The only one with rights to do anything with the work is the author.
First: so far as I read, until I started explaining my shock, I never saw that the translator actually asked the uploader to remove it. Had that been posted this would never have happened. I don't even care that it was removed, what bothers me is the demonization that is being thrown around with such hatred.
Second: yes, I am insisting that only the author... and the publisher... are the only ones who own any actual right to the works or anything they produce, unless direct permission is given.
This doesn't mean that I am demonizing the translator for doing what they did. Not at all, I respect and am grateful for what they did. ALL of the examples that I pushed were to show that legally, there is no difference from someone who takes from something official without permission and someone who takes from something not official without permission... well, with the exception of the original being 'from something official' and the latter being 'from something unofficial.'
Nor am I saying that Aereus doesn't (or, really, since legally they don't) shouldn't have any rights to their translation. This is inaccurate. They should have rights to it. What they should not do is demonize someone who, legally, is doing the same thing they started. This has little to do with morals, although we could go into morals, but more about a legal standpoint. That's why it is so laughable.
And, a-fucking-gain if Aereus had actually asked the uploader to remove it - which the uploader said they would do if asked - and this was posted somewhere - I would have never started this...
He has no problem with this:
Master Aricitic doesn't like that distributor removed the work since he shouldn't have any rights to do so. Master Aricitic will go to another site where he can freely peruse content where any random sub-scanlator took content and dumped it on the internet without credit since they don't own the rights to the work anyway. Since one wrong doesn't make a right, two wrongs should make a right.
Again, firstly, there was no indication, that I could find, that it was the 'distributor' who removed the posts. No comment, no thread, nothing but missing chapters and people reacting in shock and outrage. Sure, I should have asked first... but isn't that the entire problem with this situation?
And again, we go into 'rights' and 'not rights.' Are you talking legal or moral? If you're talking legal than you are factually incorrect, but only because you are going from Aereus' perspective. If you are talking moral... well, my ...moving on... there are entire college courses on this. One person can argue their morals and another can argue their morals. Morals are effectively opinion. They're a nice set of code to follow, but when it comes to legal code morals mean virtually nothing. The best a set of morals can do for you in a courtroom is get you the insanity plea...
Any argument I made regarding morals before was an attempt to say "That's nice. If arrested, you would still go to jail."
My morals are no better than anyone else's... baring the fact that I am not demonizing either the uploader nor Aereus. I'm just pointing out my shock and the irony of the demonization that is being done.
Also Master Aricitic, no one gives a shit about some foreign play that someone at a university your step-father works at translated with permission. He's a better person than us, fine. Don't pretend you're on higher moral ground when you're going around reading manga provided by people who practically volunteer their time, get abused by the community's trash (like you) and feeling like you're entitled to it, simply because the scanlators don't own the content. And pretending that the so-called content that YOU produce is worth anything.
*Funny how people think they produce anything of value when they don't. How could they, when they spend days posting ridiculous essays on how great they are. At least you're doing us all a favor by leaving. Oh, and no one actually cares you're leaving, so don't bother posting that you are. We really don't give a shit.
*PS: Really, we really, really don't give a shit.
And I don't give a shit that you don't give a shit.
I used the example of the private college student doing the legal translation to show it is possible to get legal and viable permission to not only translate, distribute, but to also profit from your efforts, even if you are not a financial corporation - which the student was not.
I used the example of my works - which you are right, the recent works are not getting any comments. I don't know if this is because I set up the website incorrectly or not. I've certainly gotten more than 160 views... but the ones from 2006 had plenty of comments and a small following, so with respect to those, your "nobody gives a shit" is factually incorrect -
I used the example of my works as another example of legal rights in practice.
Aereus didn't get permission. Legally, this matters, realistically, this doesn't - unless the publisher comes after them. What's-his-name didn't get permission either. Legally this doesn't matter, the documents they wrongfully uploaded were illegal anyway, he would get a slap on the wrist and the translator would be sought out and punished. Realistically, well, we can all see what happened.
And, to everyone else reading this. I do apologize for stooping to Eksentrysyti's level. (with my swearing, etc).
But I will ask again. What is the difference between: A person who is fully capable of asking for permission and doesn't, and: A person who is fully capable of asking for permission but doesn't?
(Post Script: I will probably come back and clean this up. I had a 'more intelligent' way of responding, but... that became hard as I reread the comment to reply to it. I will not, I cannot, briefly read over a comment and reply to what I think it says... So, yeah, if anyone else wants to point out my flaw[s] in reading the above post, feel free and I will amend my response based on how you read it.)